To the Editor,
With all this talk of the proposed assault-weapon ban from the governor and legislators, there's one thing that hasn't been discussed; the Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration Act and the funding it brings to the state.
This longstanding federal act imposes an excise tax on firearms, ammunition and archery equipment, directing these funds to state wildlife agencies for conservation efforts. This has been instrumental in preserving habitats and supporting wildlife management nationwide.
Over the last decade, Rhode Island has received about $70 million in total funding from the Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration Act. This estimate is based on the consistent annual apportionment of around $7 million to the state. These funds have supported land acquisitions, habitat restoration and outdoor recreational opportunities, including the acquisition of a 61-acre parcel of forestland near Big River Management Area.
However, the state’s new assault-weapon ban threatens this vital funding source. By restricting the sale of certain firearms, the ban will lead to store closures and reduced sales, which will mean fewer excise tax dollars flowing into Rhode Island’s conservation programs. This decline could significantly impact the ability to maintain and expand wildlife management efforts.
The connection between firearm sales and conservation funding is clear. As sales decrease, so too will the resources available to protect and preserve Rhode Island’s natural habitats. If the assault weapons ban passes, that funding will dry up.
Richard Petrillo Jr.
Cranston
Comments
No comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here